Thursday, December 10, 2009

Division Of State; Humiliation Of Indian Sovereigniyu;

We the Indians, have been suffering from a disease like ‘seperatism’ severely.Such quckly spreadable desease dominating as well as jeopardising the Indian democracy.Indian politics is both’missionless’ and ‘visionless’ as well. Today, we prefer to remain as being separatedone rather than be unted. We have forgot the lesson “unity is the strength”. We have become more desierous of ‘ independent existence’following this grimous trend of ‘separatism’. It is studied well, that whenever development is not taking place in any larger portion or part of the state,due to political unrest or imbalance distribution of miscellaneous facilities,then others,opponent political parties find the way of separating the said state as the solution.Such depraved and opportunistic leaders raise hue and cry and continue violently,inhumanly or by creating sentiments of provocative nature as the turmoils ges survived..A relentless protest in favour of such division or separation of the state by pledging and highlighting the golden future of the divided part goes on everywhere throughout the state.The devout leaders impulse and motivate the public towards an uncertain future that the apparent crave public can’t understand its impact. The reckless leaders all, highlight on that, how they have been deprived of their procurable facilitiesthat are avoidable from the respective state administration .It is not wrong at all, to demand the procurable facilities for the deprived section of the society from the government of the state. With a view to solve the long awaited unsolved.problem of any part of the state, raising a demand for separate state,can’t bring any significant betterment in future. It can not be the only solution.It would be wise to find an innovative way to solve the problem rather than demanding for separate existence by making a separate state.to meet the demand..
Finding possible solution for the existing problem which is long lasitng, leaders of opponent should urge for such implementation before the present government as well as to the centre. Demand for balance facilities all that should be procurable to everyone, does not necessarily mean to divide the state at all.Have there any guarantee that such division of state, could provide the same or better facilities as they aspire for. If, someone claims so, then, an opportunistic intention or attitudes of the protesting leaders could be found out latter on. For the instance,the case of ‘Jharkhand,could be stated. Also,how far the development has been taken place in ‘Uttarakhand’ and ‘Chattrishgarh’, could be a matter of discussion for its verification. No, any development, could come through such division. Application of such ‘divisive principle’ with a view to achieving better future for any section or part of the state, would definitely inflict the Indian democracy and integrity. It must be a dangerous approach, in keeping our sovereignity intact. . Continuation of such application to devide any state according to certain section’s need or demand, would humiliate not only ‘Indian Democracy’ but also give the birth to ‘fragile sovereignity’and ultimately,would imperil our ‘independence’, that we have acquired through a great revolution, in future.
In this context,centre should adhere to such sectional problem ,emphasizing on required development as far as possible, which pertaining to the state,and even in the case of different politics sustained in respective state. It is a joint responsibility of centre and the affected state,as to mitigate such problem arisen,with a view to resist the fatalism of division of the state further.

No comments: